03-20-2013, 05:30 AM
When you say "voting member" what exactly do you invision voting on? I like the concept of all of our policies being decided by the Assembly. And I don't think the Assembly granting power to the Regional Security Organization (RSO, floating another name. 
) would infringe on that, so long as the authority for the RSO/SC/Security Committee originates with the assembly. If we go back to the charter and say these positions are in charge of this, and the rest is to be decided by the Assembly, that is far less ideal.
Â
My vision of the 2beNamedBody was more a group of people who the Assembly gives special priviliages, mainly to have a higher endorsement cap. Possibly to decide the number/percent value of the cap that applies to everyone else because the Assembly frequently loses focus on that all-important job and is slow at bringing about change. No further power. And even then, all power would originate from the Assembly and could be removed thereby.
Â
And the goals, I thought, was to encourage our older players to keep a WA nation here and hopefully increase our high-influence natives who we truly know or trust. The South Pacific has a shockingly low number of high-influence natives that are involved on the forums. Most of the top 20 in high-influence nations as far as I know have had little or no interaction with the forum. I'm not saying that they are threats, but more that it would be more ideal that we have more than SB and Fudgie and B&N who we know and trust very well whom have too much influence to be ejected easily. If so shouldn't this not be a group of the VDs plus MoFA and MoS? If that's what we're doing, we should just say that cabinet members may exceed the cap if they have a WA in the region. That doesn't really seem to me to work toward the goal of getting more of us to move our WA here. Plus it doesn't seem to encourage us to keep them here permanently, since the MoFA will eventually not be the MoFA and thus not a member of teh 2beNamedBody.
Â
I'm overall confused at how this is shaping up.
) would infringe on that, so long as the authority for the RSO/SC/Security Committee originates with the assembly. If we go back to the charter and say these positions are in charge of this, and the rest is to be decided by the Assembly, that is far less ideal.Â
My vision of the 2beNamedBody was more a group of people who the Assembly gives special priviliages, mainly to have a higher endorsement cap. Possibly to decide the number/percent value of the cap that applies to everyone else because the Assembly frequently loses focus on that all-important job and is slow at bringing about change. No further power. And even then, all power would originate from the Assembly and could be removed thereby.
Â
And the goals, I thought, was to encourage our older players to keep a WA nation here and hopefully increase our high-influence natives who we truly know or trust. The South Pacific has a shockingly low number of high-influence natives that are involved on the forums. Most of the top 20 in high-influence nations as far as I know have had little or no interaction with the forum. I'm not saying that they are threats, but more that it would be more ideal that we have more than SB and Fudgie and B&N who we know and trust very well whom have too much influence to be ejected easily. If so shouldn't this not be a group of the VDs plus MoFA and MoS? If that's what we're doing, we should just say that cabinet members may exceed the cap if they have a WA in the region. That doesn't really seem to me to work toward the goal of getting more of us to move our WA here. Plus it doesn't seem to encourage us to keep them here permanently, since the MoFA will eventually not be the MoFA and thus not a member of teh 2beNamedBody.
Â
I'm overall confused at how this is shaping up.