10-22-2011, 07:10 PM
Dear chairman (and other members), as far as I can see there is no discussion on this and was put to vote immediately. While a debate before voting on a bill may not be strictly required for a democratic process, it is very much desirable. I belief strongly that no first draft is perfect, and that others catch more and/or other flaws in a text than the author.
For example, in the presentation of bills act currently under vote, there is the following dubious construction (bold emphasis mine) :
Further, the ? sign is an annoying inclusion as it is not standard available on keyboards. The only reason that I voted aye is that I wasn't very fond of the previous presentation of bills act either.
For example, in the presentation of bills act currently under vote, there is the following dubious construction (bold emphasis mine) :
Quote:2. The bill must be divided into the following parts: preamble, articles, clauses, sections, amendments, repeals.Such that strictly, articles are the main clarification of the clauses, which are in turn part of the articles that are clarifying them...
 Â
  (?1) Preamble describes briefly what the bill sponsor hopes to achieve with the bill being proposed.
 Â
  (?2) <strong class='bbc'>Articles</strong> are the main <strong class='bbc'>sections</strong> of the bill.
 Â
  (?3) Clauses contain the proposals within each Article, divided up by context.
 Â
  (?4) <strong class='bbc'>Sections</strong> clarify points proposed by the clauses.
 Â
  (?5) The Chair of the Assembly may edit the bill to fit into this format.
Further, the ? sign is an annoying inclusion as it is not standard available on keyboards. The only reason that I voted aye is that I wasn't very fond of the previous presentation of bills act either.
![[Image: 1ad3869e-07b4-47f3-8bf1-247c729479d6.jpg]](http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/Tsrill/1ad3869e-07b4-47f3-8bf1-247c729479d6.jpg)