The South Pacific Liberal Coalition Party

[Ryccia]

This is TSPLCP. Welcome! Here are our ideals:

•A free government under the current Coalition Government System.

•Mpre liberty to the people.

•Make TSP even more nice and happy.

•Team Cake Support


Current Administration:

Leader of the Party: Ryccia

Vice Leader of the Party: ---

Secretary of TSP and Political Party Relations: ---

Judge: Ryccia

Candidates:

Delegate and Vice Delegate: ---

Minister of the Army: ---

Chair of the Assembly: ---

Minister of Foreign Affairs: ---

Minister of Regional Affairs: ---


News:

•Several admins removed for "inactivity". Ryccia supports the removed admins because of proven evidence.

•Elections for Leader, Vice Leader and STSPPPL being hosted this Sunday. Elections for Judge on Monday. Candidates: Leader: Ryccia, Vice Leader: None, STSPPPL: None, Judge: Ryccia.

[Kris Kringle]

Not that it's wrong, but what exactly do you mean by "more liberty to the people"?

[Belschaft]

Oh gods, not another bloody attempt to start a political party in TSP.

 

It's not that their forbidden or anything, but they're frowned upon historically, for a variety of fairly sound reasons.

[Ryccia]

Not that it's wrong, but what exactly do you mean by "more liberty to the people"?

It means that we, on the moment I, oppose anything that is on the way of free speech, etc.


Belschaft: I do not attempt to make a "bloody attempt". If this gets violent or something else, I'll judge the protagonist of this problem and if this argument in the future continues I will disband the party.

[Kris Kringle]

My constructive criticism is that you propose something more concrete than "more freedoms". Obviously we all want the best for citizens of the region, so you need something that will set your organisation apart, make a difference.

If this gets violent or something else, I'll judge the protagonist of this problem and if this argument in the future continues I will disband the party.

That's not what he meant by "bloody".

[Ryccia]

My constructive criticism is that you propose something more concrete than "more freedoms". Obviously we all want the best for citizens of the region, so you need something that will set your organisation apart, make a difference.
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Ryccia" data-cid="121317" data-time="1395354038">
If this gets violent or something else, I'll judge the protagonist of this problem and if this argument in the future continues I will disband the party.

That's not what he meant by "bloody".</blockquote>Then what did he meant? And I'll think about it. Im just stating the ideals of this party.

[UnitedSolarRepublic]

 

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Kris Kringle" data-cid="121318" data-time="1395354571">
My constructive criticism is that you propose something more concrete than "more freedoms". Obviously we all want the best for citizens of the region, so you need something that will set your organisation apart, make a difference.

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Ryccia" data-cid="121317" data-time="1395354038">
If this gets violent or something else, I'll judge the protagonist of this problem and if this argument in the future continues I will disband the party.

That's not what he meant by "bloody".</blockquote>
Then what did he meant? And I'll think about it. Im just stating the ideals of this party.
 


</blockquote>
Just basically replace "Bloody" with "Goddamn" and you'll get what he meant. "Not another goddamn attempt at a party". Bloody is basically an intensifier which the English use for some reason, don't question it, just go with it.

[Ryccia]

Oh. Now I know.