Quote:If you want to bring him to trial then I'd like you to present the laws you consider that he has broken.
Well, the strongest charge against him relates to his involvement with Devotians, and his attempt to persuade Sedge to institute a regional purge. As he was outed in that one (by Sedge) he has been forced to fess up to his actions.
Whilst he has not applied for citizenship I believe it is not unreasonable to treat him as one, considering his intent to be delegate. This conundrum was the main reasons I didn't move for proceeding against him once it was revealed he had tried to instigate a purge - we can only try someone for 'working or plotting against the Coalition of The South Pacific' if they are a citizen (a situation that needs resolving, and I've got a general idea I head for something which would both streamline that and the judicial process). Thankfully he has solved this for us, as he has now put himself in a position where he is expected to obey our laws; 'as above, so bellow' - Delegate=citizen, delegate candidate=citizen.
To make that charge stick we have;
1. His own admission of participation
2. A large amount of evidence in TRR we're able to use, which will also identify him as a habitual liar and CGR couper
3. An IRC conversation with me, which I have saved
The charge that he was behind Frak will be harder to make stick, as while he was always our main suspect, he wasn't foolish enough to fess up to sedge that time.
However, we do have a lot of other reasons to support that suspicion, and I think with witness testimony we could establish reasonable suspicion.
Finally, I would intend to show that he continues to plot against the region; his sudden entrance into the election is merely a public facade, or so I suspect. For this we would be again reliant upon witness testimony, from myself, SB and other people.
The charge would be breach of Article 2.3 of the Charter, and I would recommend punishment in accordance of Articles 3 and 5; expulsion.