Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Motion to Change Article
#1
The Minister of the Region does hereby invest in the power to bring to motion a proposed change suggested by the assembly. The motion is to change Article 1, section C from The Marital Law of Succession.



Quote:1) Any nation wishing to seek the Delegacy of the South Pacific must meet the following conditions:

A. Must have been a registered member of the off-site forums of the South Pacific for a period no less than three months before announcing their intentions, under the provisions of this law

B. Must have had their UN nation resident in the South Pacific for a period of no less than thirty (30) days

C. Must have a collected a minimum of 150 endorsements
To:



Quote:1) Any nation wishing to seek the Delegacy of the South Pacific must meet the following conditions:

A. Must have been a registered member of the off-site forums of the South Pacific for a period no less than three months before announcing their intentions, under the provisions of this law

B. Must have had their UN nation resident in the South Pacific for a period of no less than thirty (30) days

C. Must have a collected <strong class='bbc'>a minimum of 30 % of the current delegate's endorsement total.</strong>
Please respond with a simple 'yea' in affirmation or 'nay' to signify an against stance to the proposed change. The voting will end in approximately one week; that is, at 12 am on Thursday, May 20
#2
Yea
#3
Yea(Btw, you forgot to mention that this article 1, section c is from "martial law/law of succession" Wink )
#4
Yea
===



"I learned that dreams don't work without action. I learned that no one could stop me but me. I learned that love is stronger than hate. And most important, I learned that God does exist. He and/or she is right inside you underneath the pain, the sorrow and the shame."




-tsu


#5
Yea
#6
Fixed, lol. And yea
#7
With numbers as they are throughout NS, it makes more sense by far to go with percentages, rather than an exact number.
I am the milkman of human kindness

And I will bring an extra pint
-- B. Bragg



Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters. -- Grover Cleveland



When the laws are used to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society -- the farmers, mechanics, and laborers -- who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their government -- Andrew Jackson



"Capitalism takes no prisoners and kills competition where it can." -- Vince Cable
#8
Reviewing this law and other data, is 30% too low a threshold? I realize that we do not want a high threshold but,w ith numbers down, it's nto that difficult to reach 30%. It could lead to a lot of people getting ticked at being told to drop endorsements. Would 50% satisfy concerns for security?
I am the milkman of human kindness

And I will bring an extra pint
-- B. Bragg



Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters. -- Grover Cleveland



When the laws are used to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society -- the farmers, mechanics, and laborers -- who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their government -- Andrew Jackson



"Capitalism takes no prisoners and kills competition where it can." -- Vince Cable
#9
Quote:Reviewing this law and other data, is 30% too low a threshold? I realize that we do not want a high threshold but,w ith numbers down, it's nto that difficult to reach 30%. It could lead to a lot of people getting ticked at being told to drop endorsements. Would 50% satisfy concerns for security?
That is fine for me. 50% is a good number to live with, and is easy to determine.

But maybe people would like a compromise at 40%? Not sure. I could go either way, really.
#10
Wait, we are talking about two different thresholds here.



People who want to run for delegacy need to be serious about it. Therefore we require them to have a certain minimum of endorsements before they can officially make a bid for delegacy. That's the 30% in this section.



The 50% level, which is in section 3 of the law, is the level above which they have to state their intent; at this level we consider them to be a threat, so to say.



So for anyone who <strong class='bbc'>DOES</strong> want to run for delegacy the following will hold if this law passes:



:n00b: < 30 % < candidate < 50 % < the race begins



(before it was

:n00b: < 150 < candidate < 50% < the race begins,

which didn't make sense anymore as 150 >> 50% now. )



For anyone who <strong class='bbc'>DOES NOT</strong> want to run for delegacy, it's still



friendly < 50% < invader



I hope this clarifies Smile
#11
Thanks, Tsrill. That was a bit more helpful.
I am the milkman of human kindness

And I will bring an extra pint
-- B. Bragg



Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters. -- Grover Cleveland



When the laws are used to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society -- the farmers, mechanics, and laborers -- who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their government -- Andrew Jackson



"Capitalism takes no prisoners and kills competition where it can." -- Vince Cable
#12
YEA! Bump


Quote:

5 hours ago Mavenu hm. I guess I shouldn't point out that Max Barry's not even from America, but is an Australian?

4 hours ago NationStates Moderators When did actual facts or logic have anything to do with idiot spammers?

 

Change comes not when some group of radical seizes power, that’s just a shift at the top. It comes when Mr. And Mrs. Ordinary make a stand. When the cake shop owner and teacher and the bearer boy come together and say, ‘They are not afraid,’ anymore.


Monica Whitlock – BBC “From our own Correspondent”

Nov 7/05 – in reference to actions in Uzbekistan, May 2005.
#13
law change appears to have passed


Quote:

5 hours ago Mavenu hm. I guess I shouldn't point out that Max Barry's not even from America, but is an Australian?

4 hours ago NationStates Moderators When did actual facts or logic have anything to do with idiot spammers?

 

Change comes not when some group of radical seizes power, that’s just a shift at the top. It comes when Mr. And Mrs. Ordinary make a stand. When the cake shop owner and teacher and the bearer boy come together and say, ‘They are not afraid,’ anymore.


Monica Whitlock – BBC “From our own Correspondent”

Nov 7/05 – in reference to actions in Uzbekistan, May 2005.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)