Proposal: NSA Code of Conduct

[Belschaft]

One draft and two days of debate a legislative process does not make DM. I consider my redraft superior on the following grounds;
 
1. It is in the correct legislative format
2. It possess no redundant clauses; for example, there is no need to state that all NSA members must obey TSP laws. Nor does it need stating that it can be amended by the assembly.
3. It establishes and lays out a disciplinary process, to go with the disciplinary offences, rather than the vague 'disciplinary action will be judged on a case by case basis'
4. It does not contain the blatantly unconstitutional clause allowing the NSA to declare someone guilty of treason
5. All offences are not grouped under the single charge of 'insubordination', which is inane
6. Each offence is given a formal name and a brief description, ordered alphabetically
7. The offences it lays out cover considerably more situations, including some very possible ones
 
Articles one and two I have left substantively alone; my edits there are technical. I have made substantive amendments to article three. They produced a more detailed, easier to understand, logically ordered and fairer disciplinary system. I would like you to identify any part of clause three you object to, or feel is inferior to the prior version.